Reading
Reflections and Thoughts
Towards
an Animated Architecture against Architectural Animation.
Animation
when used to conceptualise architecture
can have an obvious and expected influence on the form. Neil Spiller puts
forward the notion that "the medium has become the message". I
believe any medium architects use will have an influence on the outcome of a
design. Whether conceptualised from pen, charcoal, pencil, Autocad, foam core
model, paper model, wire mesh model or 3D animated. It is the architects choice
what medium to use. The only limiting factor with 3D animation is that everyone
has the same tools, whereas our hands and minds are our physical tools, and no
two are the same.
Project 5: Migrating
Coastlines
The
use of particle systems with various space warps makes sense to me if the
variables used to affect the particles are reflective of the actual element
they represent. In the text, pressure systems are added to correlate to the
ocean and desert views. But later it explains that the "structure and
intensity of the pressures were modulated". What value or architectural
merit do these elements have if they are free to be changed. The architect is
merely changing variable to get a form that he/she wants. This devalues the
purpose of using these animated techniques in the first place.
Temporality
and Time
This
reading discusses the method of a few select architects, these of which are all
experimenting in similar ways to our tutorial during this semester.
Staring
with a site parameter, then representing this with a space warp or pressure
field, then making this affect an object or particle system. This method ins't
a normal design process, and it leads to the creation of forms and
relationships that are previously unknown. My key concern with this type of
generative form finding is that it seems to be an exercise in post
justification. ????? States "the architectural envelope becomes entwined
with the exhibition surfaces, challenging the traditional concept of the
exhibition space as a simple white box.". To me this is saying the form
got really twisted up, and we then decided the interior space was going to be
an exhibition space. But then some of the exterior surfaces merged to interior
surfaces. So all of a sudden we are testing tradition concepts of the
exhibition space. All of this was thought of, after the form had been found.
This
reading basically tried to hammer home the idea that using generative or
multidisciplinary design software can allow designers to push the technology
and culture development cycle.
Realistically
not many small firms would be able to implement avante guard designs in
everyday life. So there is a very small market for this type of architectural
exploration. Architecture is very market driven, and if there is not much
construction or competition going on. There will be no experimental
architecture.
Concept
Adaptitecture
The
Brisbane city, and commercial architecture in general does not adapt to the
site or context. Often there are very small adaptions to do with daylighting,
or orientation of views, but never an appreciation of the form of the site.
Concept
50 aims to experiment with the way a form can engage with the context, by
appreciating and complementing the form of the site primarily. The architecture
will also be an integration of greater contextual elements influencing the
form, causing the architecture to evolve and adapt depending on site
conditions.
![]() |
SITE HAS CONTROL |
Concept Development
No comments:
Post a Comment